Friday 19th December 2014,
The Transcript

Actor’s death raises life-long questions

Adelle Brodbeck February 6, 2014 Entertainment 1 Comment
Phillip Seymour Hoffman, dead at 46. Photo from Wikimedia Commons

Phillip Seymour Hoffman, dead at 46.
Photo from Wikimedia Commons

The image Philip Seymour Hoffman left imprinted in my mind is his exceptional portrayal of rock critic Lester Bangs in  the 2000 film “Almost Famous.”

With needle still in arm and evidence of drug abuse throughout his apartment, actor Hoffman, 46 years old, was found dead on Sunday morning.

According to the New York Daily News, Hoffman was discovered by friend David Katz. Officials suspect the overdose was caused by heroin injections considering the 70 bags of the drug found scattered around Hoffman’s apartment.

Hoffman was best known for his role in the 2005 film “Capote,” as well as his Academy Awards and Tony Award nominations. His ability to transform into enticing characters transports audiences to new worlds and isn’t that what art is all about?

In the aftermath of  events such as these there arise two kinds of people: those who mourn the loss of a fellow human, and those who mourn the loss of an entertainment source. In the case of any death, those who care for the deceased usually experience a spat of selfishness. Especially when the death could be seen as self inflicted,  friends and family may blame the deceased for “playing God” and removing themselves from the world.

Personally I see people blame celebrities for robbing us of their talents. In any case with celebrities it is not our place to criticize. We are unaware of the personal circumstances involved in the death. Particularly with Hoffman’s case, who had been clean for two decades, the overdose was most likely unintentional.

Other drug related celeb deaths, such as that of “Glee” actor Cory Monteith, not only raise awareness of the ever escalating drug problem in our society, but a question of why? Is there a high concentration of fatal overdoses within the world of celebrities because there is more coverage? Or is there a specific variable in that culture that pushes many actors over the edge?

We may not be able to answer why after 23 years Hoffman resorted to drugs but we can accept his passing, appreciate the performances that he has given us and not resent him for those he will not be able to.

Like this Article? Share it!

About The Author

1 Comment

  1. Steven J Fromm March 18, 2014 at 9:08 pm

    Here is my take on this horrendous problem. Most people really do not grasp what is really going on with this disease. It is clear that after decades of sobriety, it can be gone in a nano-second. This is not a surprise to those exposed to how this disease operates.

    The only way to really understand this horrible and insidious disease of addiction is to go to AA or Naranon meetings to see what is really going on here. This exercise would offer a tremendous perspective about this deadly problem. It is often said that this is a progressive disease that results in insanity and ultimately death.

    It should also be pointed out that the only salvation is through the 12 step program that allows those afflicted to find spirituality and a higher power.

    Additionally and very importantly, readers may want to see the devastating financial and legal impact on his family by reading Philip Seymour Hoffman: Estate Planning Lessons For Us and Especially Women at http://frommtaxes.wordpress.com/2014/03/04/phillip-seymour-hoffman-lessons-for-us-women-estate-pain-left-behind/

    I hope this is of value to your readers.

Leave A Response


five × = 20